"Even if we were to say, for the sake of argument, that Hayes’ monologue was wrongheaded and offensive, it would remain the case that he 1) made sure to explicitly note that he wasn’t disrespecting any soldier who’d fallen — that is to say, he tried to anticipate which people might be needlessly offended, and to assure them that he meant something different than they thought; 2) he noted that he could be wrong; 3) he invited a panel of other intelligent people to disagree; 4) and when no one did disagree, the first thing he did was try to articulate the best counterargument that he could formulate. Unless you’re a delicate flower looking for a broadcaster who never articulates any idea with which you’re uncomfortable, what more can you ask from someone in Hayes’ position?"

In Defense of Chris Hayes
Conor Friedersdorf 

Friday Sunday Night Photography: Two Soldiers Disassemble A Nuclear Warhead
Better late than never, right?
(image courtesy of Gizmodo)
| Follow Manic, Chill |     | Subscribe to Manic, Chill(RSS) |     | Subscribe via Email |

Friday Sunday Night Photography: Two Soldiers Disassemble A Nuclear Warhead

Better late than never, right?

(image courtesy of Gizmodo)

| Follow Manic, Chill |     | Subscribe to Manic, Chill(RSS) |     | Subscribe via Email |

"If you look at the police department, their creed is to protect and to serve. A soldier’s mission is to engage his enemy in close combat and kill him. Do we want police officers to have that mentality? Of course not."

— Virginia Lawyer Arthur Rizer, a former military and civilian police officer, on the militarization of America’s local police departments.